Understand the decision
Useful research starts with a question, not a large spreadsheet. “Do people need my app?” encourages vague approval. “What did engineers do the last time they struggled to explain a project decision?” invites an account of an actual situation. The answer can reveal workarounds, urgency, costs, or that the problem matters less than you expected.
Public reviews, search results, discussions, and competitor pages are different kinds of evidence. A review can describe a frustration but may not represent the whole market. Search interest suggests a topic people investigate, not that they will buy your offer. A competitor’s promise is a claim to inspect. Keep those distinctions in your notes.
Put it to work
Create a short source register: where you looked, when, the observation, your interpretation, and an alternative interpretation. Remove personal details that do not help the decision. Look deliberately for satisfied users of the existing workaround and for reasons not to switch. This reduces the temptation to collect only supportive comments.
End the investigation with a decision and a remaining uncertainty. Choose a small initial sample based on access and budget, then expand when the answer remains important and unresolved. A fixed number of comments is not a universal research quality threshold.
Common mistake
Counting mentions as customers or treating selected comments as a representative market survey.
Put this to work
Build a sourced brief for one question and write what evidence would contradict your preferred answer.
Sources and further study
Original teaching informed by public material. These authors do not teach, endorse, or certify the RevStart course.